Again here we find numerous flaws, so let's have a closer look.
Similar to my previous posts, I have omitted fields I5, I6, J5 andJ6, as text field on it's own is good for a hugh number of possible flaws.
In row F, we have the value field (F8), where we can discover 3 possible flaws. Two in plate 1 and one in plate 2:
flaws 1.26 - 2.25 - 1.32 |
Stamp 1.26 has also flaws in quadrant I and III !On the other side of the '2', below de 'd', one of the green lines does not reach the frame (2.25).
Similar is stamp 1.32 has a green line that is broken, before it reaches the frame border. This white spot is lower than position 2.25.
The G-row has several possible flaws.
flaws 1.52 - 1.46 - 1.55 |
In the next field, (G7) there is a white spot in the tree (1.46) and in the water part right of that same tree, another white spot indicates position 1.55.
Moving further to the right, there is a white spot within the green part of the ornament (1.15), there is a white spot towards the outer frame (1.25).
flaw 1.15 - 1.25 |
flaw 2.14 - 1.53 |
A large white spot indicates flaw 2.60 - for this position, see also below.
Stamp 1.25 has a small spot attached to the triangular ornament on the left side.
On the right side, a green spot between the triangular ornament and the white decoration (1.07) and finally below the white ornament (1.25)
top : flaw 2.60 - 1.25 below : flaw 1.28 - 1.07 |
flaw 1.59 |
flaws in position 1.17 |
Stamp 2.18 starts off with few white spots on the outer side of the ornament, towards the frame border. The longer the plate was used, the more pronounced the flaws are.
flaw 2.18 |
to be continued ...
No comments:
Post a Comment